PGG Forums

Men's Interests => Politics, Philosophy and Religion => Topic started by: judE_Law on December 15, 2010, 10:31:14 PM

Title: WikiLeaks
Post by: judE_Law on December 15, 2010, 10:31:14 PM
are you aware about WikiLeaks?
grabe mga exposĂȘ nila diba?
it says na there are 2,036 documents na about the Philippines..
at confidential lahat..
eto yung isa...



WikiLeaks cable: Beijing saw Arroyo as 'good leader'
by Kris Danielle Suarez, abs-cbnNEWS.com
Posted at 12/15/2010 1:49 PM | Updated as of 12/15/2010 2:04 PM


MANILA, Philippines - A leaked cable from the US Department of State revealed China's views on the Philippines and the government of then-President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo back in 2007.

A cable sent from the US Embassy in Beijing, dated March 5, 2007, showed discussions between Eric John, then US Deputy Assistant Secretary for East Asian and Pacific Affairs (EAP), and two senior Chinese diplomats regarding Southeast Asia.

The document was posted on the whistleblower website WikiLeaks on Sunday, December 12.

The cable, labeled "secret" by the Beijing post, focused on the "overlapping interests" in the region, specifically among Myanmar (Burma), Indonesia, Thailand, East Timor, and the Philippines.

Under the subhead "Progress in the Philippines, but More Needed," the cable revealed the discussion between John and Hu Zhengyue, then Chinese Minstry of Foreign Affairs Director General for Asian Affairs, focusing on the Chinese efforts in dealing with the southeast Asian nation.

It revealed that China saw poverty as the "key challenge" facing the Philippines, and, as a response, Hu said they have "invested in its agricultural development and transportation infrastructure."

"Beijing recognizes corruption as the second significant problem facing the Philippines, but believes it "cannot do much about that," DG Hu said," the cable stated.

'GMA a good leader'

Meanwhile, China saw then-President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo as a "good leader," saying that she has shown "she is in control."

John agreed with the Chinese observation, saying Arroyo has "stabilized Philippine leadership and enacted strong fiscal and economic policy."

Despite this, John and Hu both agreed that their countries must encourage Manila to "continue working hard to promote transparency and good governance."

The cable also showed John outlined the "extremely successful" approach to counter-terrorism the Philippines has taken in Mindanao, "with the support of the United States."

Hu also said that the US and Chinese efforts in the Philippines, while "working from different directions," are "complementary."

Burma focus of cable

The cable's focus was on Myanmar, called Burma in the document, specifically the suggestion that the US should directly engage with General Than Shwe if it "wants to make a difference."

The cable also revealed US's fears that the ASEAN member is "headed at high speed in the wrong direction," saying that the US and China could be at odds with each other if Burma were to adopt a constitution that would exclude other political groups.

ASEAN, the cable revealed, was already growing "frustrated" in dealing with their member.

"After Malaysian Foreign Minister Syed Hamid's poor treatment during his 2006 visit to the country, ASEAN lost its appetite to pursue new efforts," according to Chinese Assistant Foreign Minister Cui Tian-kai.

"While agreeing that taking a long-term view of Burma issues is useful, DAS John emphasized that lack of good governance has been a persistent problem for the country. In this context, he cautioned that the Burmese leadership's adoption of a new constitution that serves to lock out certain parties from political participation would be a step backward and could harm United States-China cooperation," the cable stated.

With this, Cui said that they are confident "positive change" will come to Burma, but "it will take time," and "in line with the overall trend" in the region of moving away from military rule to a more open system, citing Indonesia, Thailand, and the Philippines.

"Indonesia's President Yudhoyono is no longer a general, AFM Cui stressed. Thailand's current military leadership will not remain in power over the long haul. While there are persistent rumors about military coups in the Philippines, they rarely happen," the cable said.

Hu, in his "personal view," added that Burma would "likely be open" to a dialogue with the US, with Chinese facilitation.

Southeast Asia

Meanwhile, Cui and John also discussed "capitalizing" on their mutual interests in "promoting stability and prosperity" in the region, to "dispel the perception that the two are competing in a zero-sum game."

"AFM Cui said Beijing's interest in Southeast Asia is not a threat, but a logical result of geography, including China's 2,500 mile land border with Southeast Asian nations and sharing of the South China Sea," the cable stated.

"The United States and China must discourage the Cold War mentality that cooperating with one of us is an inherent rejection of the other, AFM Cui said," it stated.

Hu and John discussed "the importance of Indonesia" and the"instability" in East Timor, and the situation in post-coup Thailand.

In Indonesia, the US and China "must work together to promote democratization, economic growth and counter-terrorism," the cable noted.

Meanwhile, the two countries eyed cooperation in helping promote stability in East Timor.

Finally, the diplomats discussed the situation in Thailand, which has just undergone a coup in September 2006.

Thomas Christensen, another EAP Deputy Assistant Secretary, was also at the meetings, the cable noted.

1,463 cables released so far

A total of 1,796 diplomatic cables from the United States embassy in Manila are part of more than 251,000 documents leaked by the website WikiLeaks, starting last November 28.

The leaked memos are part of a release that Julian Assange, the chief of the whistleblower website, described as a "diplomatic history of the United States" that would cover "every major issue" as governments braced for damaging revelations.

Based on a database made public by The Guardian newspaper in the United Kingdom, out of the total sent by the US embassy in Manila, 1,794 were sent between January 2005 to February 2010. The remaining two leaked cables are dated Novemer 21, 2001 and July 19, 1994.

The Philippines is discussed in 2,036 documents. Iraq, the most discussed country in the database, clocks in at 15,365 cables.

The full texts of the leaked cables sent by the US embassy in Manila have yet to be released. WikiLeaks is planning to release the documents "in stages over the next few months."

As of Wednesday, a total of 1,463 documents had been published on the site, none from Manila


http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/nation/12/15/10/wikileaks-cable-beijing-saw-arroyo-good-leader
Title: Re: WikiLeaks
Post by: carpediem on December 15, 2010, 10:36:05 PM
One leaked cable from Australia that just got reported today said that the Philippines is a "basket case", where it is becoming a breeding ground for terrorism.
Title: Re: WikiLeaks
Post by: Mr.Yos0 on December 15, 2010, 10:43:25 PM
kaka aresto lang ng founder nito sa london. hindi related dito kundi rape case.

pero andaming classified, confidential info ang na-exposed sa wikileaks.
Title: Re: WikiLeaks
Post by: judE_Law on December 15, 2010, 11:06:57 PM
pabor ba kayo na ilabas tong mga dokumento na 'to o hindi?
Title: Re: WikiLeaks
Post by: Mr.Yos0 on December 15, 2010, 11:14:30 PM
yung iba, oo. pero yung mga highly classified na relevant pa rin sa mga nangyayari ngayon, hindi. it can threaten the security of a specific person, state or country.
Title: Re: WikiLeaks
Post by: judE_Law on December 17, 2010, 03:51:09 PM
Quote from: Mr.Yos0 on December 15, 2010, 11:14:30 PM
yung iba, oo. pero yung mga highly classified na relevant pa rin sa mga nangyayari ngayon, hindi. it can threaten the security of a specific person, state or country.


eh what about those issues na involve ang pilipinas? don't you think as a filipino, you deserve to know the truth about how other countries/leaders view us, as a nation?
Title: Re: WikiLeaks
Post by: Mr.Yos0 on December 17, 2010, 08:54:22 PM
yung iba lang talaga.. pero yung ibang mga sensitive, confidential wag na.
Title: Re: WikiLeaks
Post by: carpediem on December 17, 2010, 11:21:31 PM
The fact that there are leaks means that these are not properly secured. So it is possible that organizations other than WikiLeaks and the 5 newspapers may have acquired these.
Title: Re: WikiLeaks
Post by: Mr.Yos0 on December 18, 2010, 01:04:31 AM
definitely.
Title: Re: WikiLeaks
Post by: judE_Law on December 18, 2010, 12:15:05 PM
Quote from: carpediem on December 17, 2010, 11:21:31 PM
The fact that there are leaks means that these are not properly secured. So it is possible that organizations other than WikiLeaks and the 5 newspapers may have acquired these.

worst is.. pati mga terorista may kopya din.. alam nila nangyayari sa mundo..
Title: Re: WikiLeaks
Post by: Mr.Yos0 on December 18, 2010, 04:30:55 PM
Quote from: judE_Law on December 18, 2010, 12:15:05 PM
Quote from: carpediem on December 17, 2010, 11:21:31 PM
The fact that there are leaks means that these are not properly secured. So it is possible that organizations other than WikiLeaks and the 5 newspapers may have acquired these.

worst is.. pati mga terorista may kopya din.. alam nila nangyayari sa mundo..

yan ang tinutukoy kong di dapat ilabas. malay mo may mga on going intelligence war pala against them, ayun nalantad.
Title: Re: WikiLeaks
Post by: judE_Law on December 18, 2010, 06:29:56 PM
Quote from: Mr.Yos0 on December 18, 2010, 04:30:55 PM
Quote from: judE_Law on December 18, 2010, 12:15:05 PM
Quote from: carpediem on December 17, 2010, 11:21:31 PM
The fact that there are leaks means that these are not properly secured. So it is possible that organizations other than WikiLeaks and the 5 newspapers may have acquired these.

worst is.. pati mga terorista may kopya din.. alam nila nangyayari sa mundo..

yan ang tinutukoy kong di dapat ilabas. malay mo may mga on going intelligence war pala against them, ayun nalantad.


on the other hand...
nabubulgar kung anong tingin ng ibang bansa sa atin.. nalalaman kung sino ang tunay na kaaway at sino ang tunay na kakampi.
Title: Re: WikiLeaks
Post by: joshgroban on December 22, 2010, 10:04:58 PM
if you have nothing to hide so be it theres nothing to be afraid of
Title: Re: WikiLeaks
Post by: carpediem on December 22, 2010, 10:50:43 PM
I am curious if the US has a hand in some of our government's actions, like EDSA 1, Estrada controversies, EDSA 2, GMA impeachment, VFA, the recent elections, etc.
Title: Re: WikiLeaks
Post by: Mr.Yos0 on December 22, 2010, 11:08:07 PM
palagay ko, may kinalaman lahat ng US sa mga major events na nangyayari sa mundo.

Lumabas noon diba? na may kinalaman ang CIA sa pagpapabagsak sa mga komunistang gobyerno sa mga bansa sa Europa at South America? para daw gawing capitalist-democratic state na pro-US? And in many ways, the US in turn will benefit [a ton] from them.
Title: Re: WikiLeaks
Post by: pinoybrusko on January 02, 2011, 02:32:19 PM
parang naging silent na ang grupo na ito at wala na sila na release na mga documents ulit
Title: Re: WikiLeaks
Post by: judE_Law on January 03, 2011, 12:21:04 PM
Quote from: pinoybrusko on January 02, 2011, 02:32:19 PM
parang naging silent na ang grupo na ito at wala na sila na release na mga documents ulit

kasi bukod sa naaresto na si WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.. eh medyo hindi naging maganda reaction ng iba't ibang bansa sa mga pinaka-huling exposĂȘ's nila..
Title: Re: WikiLeaks
Post by: mang juan on February 02, 2011, 10:28:30 AM
Wikileaks reveals smuggled uranium in the Philippines

MANILA, Philippines - The Wikileaks website on Wednesday released a confidential cable from the United States embassy in London revealing the possible illicit smuggling of radioactive material in the Philippines in 2007.

The cable was dated November 21, 2007 and was marked as "sensitive".

The cable revealed that an unidentified male called the US Foreign Service National Investigator (FSNI) unit on November 20, 2007 and revealed he had information about the "possible sale of uranium that formerly belonged to the US."

"The FSNI unit received a phone call from subject, xxxxxx, stating he had worked with divers in the Philippines previously and was recently contacted by them with information that they had found 5-6 Uranim 'bricks' at the sight (sic) of an underwater wreck," the cable said.

It said the caller's contacts expressed a desire to sell the radioactive material for profit.

On the same day, the Regional Security Office Investigation Unit received an unclassified e-mail with 9 photo attachments of the radioactive bricks.

The cable said the unidentified male had sent faxes to the US Embassy and the Central Intelligence Agency but had yet to receive a response. T

At the time the memo was issued, Philippine authorities had not been notified. It noted that the supplier/ origin point and intended destination of the material was still unknown.

The Bagong Alyansang Makabayan, meanwhile, said the sensitive cable raises questions on why US forces are bringing radioactive material in Philippine territory.

Bayan secretary general Renato M. Reyes, Jr. said that under the Visiting Forces Agreement, Philippine authorities are not allowed to inspect the warships of the US forces and US commanders merely issue a general statement certifying the contents of the vehicles.

"Was there a US ship that sunk, and is this what's being described as the underwater wreck? Was this ship nuclear-powered?" Reyes asked.

Reyes also sought a response from the Department of Foreign Affairs if they were at anytime notified of such a situation and if there were any reports of US ships sinking anywhere in the Philippines.

"Does the DFA even know about this or were they at any point formally notified by the US government? Or was this kept a secret because it will expose the US government's violation of the constitutional ban on nuclear weapons?" Reyes asked.

source: http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/nation/02/02/11/wikileaks-reveals-smuggled-uranium-philippines?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=abscbnnews&utm_term=mainfeed
Title: Re: WikiLeaks
Post by: judE_Law on February 02, 2011, 10:43:00 PM
^hindi napapansin 'tong mga infos na 'to...
puro politics at crime kasi ang nagdo-domina ngayon eh..